Advertisement

Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Formulas Modified for Patients with Keratoconus

      Purpose

      To assess the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas modified specifically for patients with keratoconus (Holladay 2 with keratoconus adjustment and Kane keratoconus formula) compared with normal IOL power formulas (Barrett Universal 2, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Kane, and SRK/T).

      Design

      Retrospective consecutive case series.

      Participants

      A total of 147 eyes of 147 patients with keratoconus.

      Methods

      Data from patients with keratoconus who had preoperative IOLMaster biometry were included. A single eye per qualifying patient was randomly selected. The predicted refraction was calculated for each of the formulas and compared with the actual refractive outcome to give the prediction error. Subgroup analysis based on the steepest corneal power measured by biometry (stage 1: ≤48 diopters [D], stage 2: >48 D and ≤53 D, and stage 3: >53 D) was performed.

      Main Outcome Measure

      Prediction error.

      Results

      On the basis of the mean absolute prediction error (MAE), the formulas were ranked as follows: Kane keratoconus formula (0.81 D), SRK/T (1.00 D), Barrett Universal 2 (1.03 D), unmodified Kane (1.05 D), Holladay 1 (1.18 D), unmodified Holladay 2 (1.19 D), Haigis (1.22 D), Hoffer Q (1.30 D), and Holladay 2 with keratoconus adjustment (1.32 D). The Kane keratoconus formula had a statistically significant lower MAE compared with all formulas (P < 0.01). In stage 3 keratoconus, all nonmodified formulas had a hyperopic mean prediction error ranging from 1.72 to 3.02 D.

      Conclusions

      The Kane keratoconus formula was the most accurate formula in this series. The SRK/T was the most accurate of the traditional IOL formulas. All normal IOL formulas resulted in hyperopic refractive outcomes that worsened as the corneal power increased. Suggestions for target refractive aims in each stage of keratoconus are given.

      Abbreviations and Acronyms:

      D (diopter), ELP (effective lens position), IOL (intraocular lens), MAE (mean absolute prediction error), MedAE (median absolute prediction error), SRK/T (Sanders, Retzlaff, Kraff), ULIB (User Group for Laser Interference Biometry)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Ophthalmology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kamiya K.
        • Iijima K.
        • Nobuyuki S.
        • et al.
        Predictability of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation for Cataract with Keratoconus: a multicenter study.
        Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 1312
        • Savini G.
        • Abbate R.
        • Hoffer K.J.
        • et al.
        Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with keratoconus.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019; 45: 576-581
        • Watson M.P.
        • Anand S.
        • Bhogal M.
        • et al.
        Cataract surgery outcome in eyes with keratoconus.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98: 361-364
        • Melles R.B.
        • Holladay J.T.
        • Chang W.J.
        Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas.
        Ophthalmology. 2018; 125: 169-178
        • Camps V.J.
        • Piñero D.P.
        • Caravaca-Arens E.
        • et al.
        New approach for correction of error associated with keratometric estimation of corneal power in keratoconus.
        Cornea. 2014; 33: 960-967
        • Holladay J.T.
        Holladay IOL Consultant Software & Surgical Outcomes Assessment. 1105.2019 ed.
        Holladay Consulting, Bellaire, TX2019
        • Connell B.J.
        • Kane J.X.
        Comparison of the Kane formula with existing formulas for intraocular lens power selection.
        BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2019; 4 (e000251)
        • Kane J.X.
        Kane Formula.
        (Available at:)
        www.iolformula.com
        Date: 2019
        Date accessed: July 12, 2019
        • Hoffer K.J.
        • Aramberri J.
        • Haigis W.
        • et al.
        Protocols for studies of intraocular lens formula accuracy.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 2015; 160: 403-405.e1
        • Wang L.
        • Koch D.D.
        • Hill W.
        • Abulafia A.
        Pursuing perfection in intraocular lens calculations: III. Criteria for analyzing outcomes.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017; 43: 999-1002
        • Haigis W.
        • Lege B.
        • Miller N.
        • Schneider B.
        Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis.
        Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000; 238: 765-773
        • Hoffer K.J.
        The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993; 19 (errata, 1994;20:677; errata, 2007;33:2-3): 700-712
        • Holladay J.T.
        • Prager T.C.
        • Chandler T.Y.
        • et al.
        A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988; 14: 17-24
        • Retzlaff J.A.
        • Sanders D.R.
        • Kraff M.C.
        Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990; 16 (erratum, 1990;16:528): 333-340
        • Barrett G.
        Barrett Universal II Formula.
        (Available at:)
        http://calc.apacrs.org/barrett_universal2105/
        Date: 2018
        Date accessed: July 13, 2019
        • Olsen T.
        • Hoffmann P.
        C constant: new concept for ray tracing-assisted intraocular lens power calculation.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40: 764-773
        • Haigis W.
        Optimized IOL constants for the ZEISS IOLMaster.
        (Available at:)
        http://ocusoft.de/ulib/c1.htm
        Date accessed: August 19, 2019
        • Krumeich J.H.
        • Daniel J.
        • Knalle A.
        Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24: 456-463
        • Aristodemou P.
        • Knox Cartwright N.E.
        • et al.
        Statistical analysis for studies of intraocular lens formula accuracy.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 2015; 160: 1085-1086
        • Melles R.B.
        • Kane J.X.
        • Olsen T.
        • Chang W.J.
        Update on intraocular lens calculation formulas.
        Ophthalmology. 2019; 126: 1334-1335
        • Haigis W.
        Occurrence of erroneous anterior chamber depth in the SRK/T formula.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993; 19: 442-446
        • Sheard R.M.
        • Smith G.T.
        • Cooke D.L.
        Improving the prediction accuracy of the SRK/T formula: The T2 formula.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36: 1829-1834
        • Akman A.
        • Asena L.
        • Güngör S.G.
        Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2016; 100: 1201-1205
        • Koch D.D.
        The posterior cornea: hiding in plain sight.
        Ophthalmology. 2015; 122: 1070-1071

      Linked Article