Advertisement

Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Ultrathin DSAEK in the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial

A Randomized Clinical Trial
Published:February 15, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.02.007

      Purpose

      To compare corneal higher-order aberrations (HOA) after ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

      Design

      Patient- and outcome-masked randomized controlled clinical trial.

      Participants

      Patients with damaged or diseased endothelium from Fuchs endothelial dystrophy or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy who were good candidates for DMEK or ultrathin DSAEK.

      Methods

      Corneal anterior and posterior surface HOA were measured with Scheimpflug imaging before surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. HOA after ultrathin DSAEK and DMEK were compared; correlation was performed between best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and HOA at each time point.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Higher-order aberrations of the anterior and posterior cornea, expressed as the root mean square deviation from a best fit sphere reference surface.

      Results

      At 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, the posterior corneal surface had significantly less coma (P ≤ 0.003) and total HOA (P ≤ 0.001) in DMEK compared with ultrathin DSAEK (4.0- and 6.0-mm OZ). Posterior trefoil (P ≤ 0.034), secondary astigmatism (P ≤ 0.042), and tetrafoil (P ≤ 0.045) were lower in DMEK than ultrathin DSAEK at 3, 6, or 12 months (either 4.0- or 6.0-mm OZ). There were no significant differences in anterior surface HOA between DMEK and ultrathin DSAEK at any post-surgical time. Compared with baseline, total posterior HOA was increased (P ≤ 0.036) in ultrathin DSAEK at 3, 6, and 12 months, in contrast to DMEK, where it was decreased (P ≤ 0.044) at 6 and 12 months (4.0- or 6.0-mm OZ, or both). At 6 and 12 months, posterior corneal total HOA correlated with BSCVA (ρ ≤ 0.635, P ≤ 0.001; 4.0- and 6.0-mm OZ). There were no moderate or strong correlations between anterior or combined corneal surface HOA at any time point after surgery.

      Conclusions

      Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty results in less posterior corneal HOA compared with ultrathin DSAEK. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty decreases and ultrathin DSAEK increases posterior corneal HOA compared with presurgical values. Total posterior corneal HOA correlates with 6- and 12-month postoperative visual acuity and may account for the better visual acuity observed after DMEK.

      Abbreviations and Acronyms:

      BSCVA (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity), DETECT (Descemet Endothelial ThicknEss Comparison Trial), DMEK (Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty), DSAEK (Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty), EK (endothelial keratoplasty), HOA (higher-order aberration), OZ (optical zone)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Ophthalmology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Patel S.
        • Baratz K.
        • Hodge D.
        • et al.
        The effect of corneal light scatter on vision after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty.
        Arch Ophthalmol. 2009; 12: 153-160
        • Van Dijk K.
        • Droutsas K.
        • Hou J.
        • et al.
        Optical quality of the cornea after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 2014; 158: 71-79.e1
        • Nielsen E.
        • Ivarsen A.
        • Kristensen S.
        • Hjortdal J.
        Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy: a controlled prospective study on visual recovery after endothelial keratoplasty.
        Acta Ophthalmol. 2016; 94: 780-787
        • Hayashi T.
        • Yamaguchi T.
        • Yuda K.
        • et al.
        Topographic characteristics after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
        PLoS One. 2017; 12: 1-14
        • Rudolph M.
        • Laaser K.
        • Bachmann B.O.
        • et al.
        Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
        Ophthalmology. 2012; 119: 528-535
        • Singh A.
        • Zarei-Ghanavati M.
        • Avadhanam V.
        • Liu C.
        Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty/descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
        Cornea. 2017; 36: 1437-1443
        • Pavlovic I.
        • Shajari M.
        • Herrmann E.
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of postoperative outcome parameters comparing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
        Cornea. 2017; 36: 1445-1451
        • Patel S.V.
        • Baratz K.H.
        • Maguire L.J.
        • et al.
        Anterior corneal aberrations after Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy.
        Ophthalmology. 2012; 119: 1522-1529
        • Chamberlain W.
        • Lin C.C.
        • Austin A.
        • et al.
        Descemet endothelial thickness comparison trial: a randomized trial comparing ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
        Ophthalmology. 2019; 126: 19-26
        • Yamaguchi T.
        • Negishi K.
        • Yamaguchi K.
        • et al.
        Effect of anterior and posterior corneal surface irregularity on vision after Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35: 688-694
        • Pantanelli S.M.
        • Sabesan R.
        • Ching S.S.T.
        • et al.
        Visual performance with wave aberration correction after penetrating, deep anterior lamellar, or endothelial keratoplasty.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 4797-4804
        • McLaren J.W.
        • Patel S.V.
        Modeling the effect of forward scatter and aberrations on visual acuity after endothelial keratoplasty.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 5545-5551
        • Salmon T.O.
        • van de Pol C.
        Normal-eye Zernike coefficients and root-mean-square wavefront errors.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32: 2064-2074
        • Hindman H.B.
        • Huxlin K.R.
        • Pantanelli S.M.
        • et al.
        Post-DSAEK optical changes: a comprehensive prospective analysis on the role of ocular wavefront aberrations, haze, and corneal thickness.
        Cornea. 2013; 32: 1567-1577
        • Muftuoglu O.
        • Prasher P.
        • Bowman R.W.
        • et al.
        Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
        Ophthalmology. 2010; 117: 878-884.e6
        • Heinzelmann S.
        • Böhringer D.
        • Eberwein P.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study.
        Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016; 254: 515-522
        • Droutsas K.
        • Lazaridis A.
        • Papaconstantinou D.
        • et al.
        Visual outcomes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: comparison of specific matched pairs.
        Cornea. 2016; 35: 765-771
        • Dickman M.M.
        • Cheng Y.Y.Y.
        • Berendschot T.T.J.M.
        • et al.
        Effects of graft thickness and asymmetry on visual gain and aberrations after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
        JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013; 131: 737-744
        • Koch D.D.
        • Jenkins R.B.
        • Weikert M.P.
        • et al.
        Correcting astigmatism with toric intraocular lenses: effect of posterior corneal astigmatism.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39: 1803-1809
        • Sicam V.
        • Dubbelman M.
        • van der Heijde R.G.L.
        Spherical aberration of the anterior and posterior surface of the human cornea.
        J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2006; 23: 544-549
        • Dubbelman M.
        • Sicam V.A.D.P.
        • Van Der Heijde G.L.
        The shape of the anterior and posterior surface of the aging human cornea.
        Vision Res. 2006; 46: 993-1001
        • Yamaguchi T.
        • Ohnuma K.
        • Tomida D.
        • et al.
        The contribution of the posterior surface to the corneal aberrations in eyes after keratoplasty.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 6222-6229
        • Chen M.
        • Sabesan R.
        • Ahmad K.
        • Yoon G.
        Correcting anterior corneal aberration and variability of lens movements in keratoconic eyes with back-surface customized soft contact lenses.
        Opt Lett. 2007; 32: 3203-3205
        • Chen M.
        • Yoon G.
        Posterior corneal aberrations and their compensation effects on anterior corneal aberrations in keratoconic eyes.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49: 5645-5652
        • Artal P.
        • Guirao A.
        • Berrio E.
        • Williams D.R.
        Compensation of corneal aberrations by the internal optics of the eyes.
        J Vis. 2001; 1: 1-8
        • Li J.Y.
        • Terry M.A.
        • Goshe J.
        • et al.
        Three-year visual acuity outcomes after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
        Ophthalmology. 2012; 119: 1126-1129
        • Kurji K.H.
        • Cheung A.Y.
        • Eslani M.
        • et al.
        Comparison of visual acuity outcomes between nanothin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
        Cornea. 2018; 37: 1226-1231