Pupillary Reconstruction and Outcome after Artificial Iris Implantation

Published:February 27, 2016DOI:


      Patients with iris defects suffer from severe visual impairment, especially increased glare sensitivity and cosmetic disturbances. This constitutes a great psychological strain for those patients. Until recently, possible treatment options were iris print contact lenses, sunglasses, and simple iris prostheses. The aim of this study was to investigate structural and functional outcome parameters and patient satisfaction after implantation of this new artificial iris prosthesis.


      Prospective case series investigating functional results and patient satisfaction after surgical iris reconstruction.


      Thirty-seven consecutive patients with traumatic iris defects presenting from 2011 through 2014 underwent pupillary reconstruction with a new artificial iris implant at the Department of Ophthalmology, Technical University Munich.


      The custom-made, flexible silicone iris prosthesis ArtificialIris (HumanOptics, Erlangen, Germany) used in this study is a novel and innovative device in the surgical treatment of iris defects. Patients were examined before and after iris reconstruction with the iris implant placed in the ciliary sulcus.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Change of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), pupillary aperture, glare, contrast sensitivity, endothelial cell density, anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber angle, and patient satisfaction were assessed.


      Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients (mean age, 52.9±16.0 years) were included. After implantation and during follow-up, BCVA and IOP did not change significantly (BCVA, 0.77±0.62 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] preoperatively vs. 0.68±0.64 logMAR 1 month postoperatively [P = 0.792]; IOP, 14.94±3.55 mmHg preoperatively vs. 17.72±5.88 mmHg 1 month postoperatively [P = 0.197]). The pupillary aperture was reduced significantly (42.11±20.1 mm2 to 8.7±0.3 mm2; P < 0.001). Contrast sensitivity increased significantly (0.80±0.51 to 0.93±0.49; P = 0.014). Endothelial cell count revealed a significant decrease postoperatively (1949±716 per 1 mm2 to 1841±689 per 1 mm2; P = 0.003). Anterior chamber depth (4.03±1.06 mm preoperatively vs. 4.29±0.70 mm postoperatively; P = 0.186) and angle (43.2±13.5° preoperatively vs. 40.5±10.8° postoperatively; P = 0.772) showed no significant differences. Subjective impairment through glare (9.12±1.62 preoperatively vs. 3.07±2.29 postoperatively; P < 0.001) and cosmetic disturbance (6.33±3.21 preoperatively vs. 1.58±0.86 postoperatively; P < 0.001) improved significantly. Patient satisfaction with the overall result was 8.91±1.51 of 10 points on an analog scale.


      The implantation of the artificial iris is a new and effective therapeutic option for the treatment of distinctive traumatic iris defects and results in an individual, aesthetically appealing, and good functional outcome in addition to high patient satisfaction.

      Abbreviations and Acronyms:

      BCVA (best-corrected visual acuity), CS (contrast sensitivity), IOL (intraocular lens), IOP (intraocular pressure), logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment


      Subscribe to Ophthalmology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Szurman P.
        • Jaissle G.
        Artificial iris.
        Ophthalmologe. 2011; 108: 720-727
        • Wolff J.
        Prosthetic iris devices.
        Ophthalmologe. 2011; 108: 714-719
        • Koch K.R.
        • Heindl L.M.
        • Cursiefen C.
        • Koch H.R.
        Artificial iris devices: benefits, limitations, and management of complications.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40: 376-382
        • Roman S.
        • Cherrate H.
        • Trouvet J.P.
        • et al.
        Artificial iris intraocular lenses in aniridia or iris deficiencies.
        J Fr Ophtalmol. 2009; 32: 320-325
        • Pozdeeva N.A.
        New model of artificial iris-lens diaphragm for correction of large iris defects: clinical and functional results of implantation.
        Vestn Oftalmol. 2013; 129: 38-42, 44
        • Reinhard T.
        • Engelhardt S.
        • Sundmacher R.
        Black diaphragm aniridia intraocular lens for congenital aniridia: long-term follow-up.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26: 375-381
        • Sundmacher R.
        • Reinhard T.
        • Althaus C.
        Black-diaphragm intraocular lens for correction of aniridia.
        Ophthalmic Surg. 1994; 25: 180-185
        • Li J.
        • Yuan G.
        • Ying L.
        • et al.
        Modified implantation of black diaphragm intraocular lens in traumatic aniridia.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39: 822-825
        • Spitzer M.S.
        • Yoeruek E.
        • Leitritz M.A.
        • et al.
        A new technique for treating posttraumatic aniridia with aphakia: first results of haptic fixation of a foldable intraocular lens on a foldable and custom-tailored iris prosthesis.
        Arch Ophthalmol. 2012; 130: 771-775
        • Ayliffe W.
        • Groth S.L.
        • Sponsel W.E.
        Small-incision insertion of artificial iris prostheses.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38: 362-367
        • Haritoglou C.
        Artificial iris after severe trauma of the orbit.
        Ophthalmologe. 2015; 112 ([Article in German]): 599-601
        • Rana M.
        • Savant V.
        • Prydal J.I.
        A new customized artificial iris diaphragm for treatment of traumatic aniridia.
        Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013; 36: 93-94
        • Dinc U.A.
        • Oncel B.
        • Gorgun E.
        • Yalvac I.S.
        Assessment of anterior chamber angle using Visante OCT, slit-lamp OCT, and Pentacam.
        Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010; 20: 531-537
        • Koc M.
        • Ozulken K.
        • Ayar O.
        • Karakurt A.
        Measurement of the anterior chamber angle according to quadrants and age groups using Pentacam Scheimpflug camera.
        J Glaucoma. 2013; 22: 226-229
        • Savini G.
        • Olsen T.
        • Carbonara C.
        • et al.
        Anterior chamber depth measurement in pseudophakic eyes: a comparison of Pentacam and ultrasound.
        J Refract Surg. 2010; 26: 341-347
        • Pelli D.G.
        • Robson J.G.
        • Wilkins A.J.
        The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity.
        Clin Vis Sci. 1988; 2: 187-199
        • Singh A.
        • Kendal A.
        • Trivedi D.
        • Cazabon S.
        Patient expectation and satisfaction after macular hole surgery.
        Optom Vis Sci. 2011; 88: 312-316
        • Sipos E.
        • Stifter E.
        • Menapace R.
        Patient satisfaction and postoperative pain with different postoperative therapy regimens after standardized cataract surgery: a randomized intraindividual comparison.
        Int Ophthalmol. 2011; 31: 453-460
        • Visser N.
        • Nuijts R.M.
        • de Vries N.E.
        • Bauer N.J.
        Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after cataract surgery with toric multifocal intraocular lens implantation.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37: 2034-2042
        • Magnus J.
        • Trau R.
        • Mathysen D.G.
        • Tassignon M.J.
        Safety of an artificial iris in a phakic eye.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38: 1097-1100
        • Mayer C.S.
        • Hoffmann A.E.
        Surgical treatment with an artificial iris.
        Ophthalmologe. 2015; 112: 865-868
        • Thomas B.C.
        • Rabsilber T.M.
        • Auffarth G.U.
        Aniridia-IOL and artificial iris reconstruction.
        Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2013; 230: 786-790
        • Kacerovska J.
        • Kacerovsky M.
        • Kadlec R.
        Development of number of endothelial cells after cataract surgery performed by femtolaser in comparison to conventional phacoemulsification.
        Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2013; 69: 215-218
        • Rosenthal K.J.
        • Venkateswaran N.
        Clinical and ultrasound biomicroscopic findings in a patient with anterior vaulting of a customized, flexible artificial iris.
        J Refract Surg. 2013; 29: 663-664

      Linked Article