Advertisement

Predictors of Matching in an Ophthalmology Residency Program

Published:December 26, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.028

      Purpose

      To examine the characteristics of US medical students applying for ophthalmology residency and to determine the predictors of matching.

      Design

      A retrospective case series.

      Participants

      A total of 3435 medical students from the United States who applied to an ophthalmology residency program from 2003 to 2008 were included.

      Methods

      Matched and unmatched applicants were compared and stratified by predictor variables, including United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score, Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) status, medical school reputation, and medical school geographic region. Differences in proportions were analyzed using the Fisher exact test. Logistic regression was used to determine the predictors of successful matching.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Successful matching to an ophthalmology program.

      Results

      The majority of applicants (72%, 2486/3435) matched in ophthalmology. In multivariate analysis, AOA membership (odds ratio [OR], 2.6, P<0.0001), USMLE score (OR, 1.6; P<0.0001), presence of an ophthalmology residency at medical school (OR, 1.4; P = 0.01), top 25 medical school (OR, 1.4; P<0.03), top 10 medical school (OR, 1.6; P<0.02), and allopathic degree (OR, 4.0; P<0.0001) were statistically significant predictors of matching. Approximately 60% (1442/2486) of applicants matched to the same geographic region as their medical school. Applicants were more likely to match at a program in the same geographic region as their medical school than would be predicted by chance alone (P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, higher USMLE score (OR, 0.9; P<0.0001) and top 10 medical school (OR, 0.7; P = 0.027) were statistically significant predictors of matching to outside the geographic region as one's medical school.

      Conclusions

      The majority of applicants applying for an ophthalmology residency position match successfully. Higher performance on quantitative metrics seems to confer an advantage for matching. The majority of applicants match at a residency program within the same geographic region as one's medical school.

      Financial Disclosure(s)

      The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to Ophthalmology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. National Resident Matching Program: data and reports.
        (Accessed March 1, 2012)
      2. San Francisco Match. Ophthalmology residency match report–January 2012.
        (Accessed April 1, 2012)
        • Johnson G.A.
        • Bloom J.N.
        • Szczotka-Flynn L.
        • et al.
        A comparative study of resident performance on standardized training examinations and the American Board of Ophthalmology written examination.
        Ophthalmology. 2010; 117: 2435-2439
        • Stratman E.J.
        • Ness R.M.
        Factors associated with successful matching to dermatology residency programs by reapplicants and other applicants who previously graduated from medical school.
        Arch Dermatol. 2010; 147: 196-202
        • McGaghie W.C.
        • Cohen E.R.
        • Wayne D.B.
        Are United States Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 and 2 scores valid measures for postgraduate medical residency selection decisions?.
        Acad Med. 2011; 86: 48-52
        • Gunderman R.B.
        • Jackson V.P.
        Are NBME examination scores useful in selecting radiology residency candidates?.
        Acad Radiol. 2000; 7: 603-606
        • Case S.M.
        • Swanson D.B.
        Validity of NBME Part I and Part II scores for selection of residents in orthopaedic surgery, dermatology, and preventive medicine.
        Acad Med. 1993; 68: S51-S56
        • Yousuf S.J.
        • Jones L.S.
        Ophthalmology Residency Match outcomes for 2011.
        Ophthalmology. 2012; 119: 642-646
        • Nallasamy S.
        • Uhler T.
        • Nallasamy N.
        • et al.
        Ophthalmology resident selection: current trends in selection criteria and improving the process.
        Ophthalmology. 2010; 117: 1041-1047
        • U.S. Department of Commerce
        Census Bureau regions and divisions with state FIPs codes.
        (Accessed April 1, 2012)
      3. 2nd front: best graduate school. Schools of medicine.
        US News & World Report. 2003; : 134-176
      4. Special report. America's best graduate schools.
        US News & World Report. 2004; 136: 72
      5. Special report: America's best graduate schools.
        US News & World Report. 2005; 138 (78): 76
        • Schools of medicine
        US News & World Report. 2006; 140: 74
        • Comarow A.
        What it takes to be the best.
        US News & World Report. 2007; 142: 90-92
        • The Consus Group
        U.S. News. Best medical schools: research (2008).
        (Accessed April 1, 2012)
        • Wagoner N.E.
        • Suriano J.R.
        Recommendations for changing the residency selection process based on a survey of program directors.
        Acad Med. 1992; 67: 459-465
        • Bernstein A.D.
        • Jazrawi L.M.
        • Elbeshbeshy B.
        • et al.
        An analysis of orthopaedic residency selection criteria.
        Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2002; 61: 49-57
        • Green M.
        • Jones P.
        • Thomas Jr, J.X.
        Selection criteria for residency: results of a national program directors survey.
        Acad Med. 2009; 84: 362-367