Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: The Tenuous Relationship between Donor Thickness and Postoperative Vision


      To determine whether preoperative donor thickness has a relationship with postoperative visual acuity after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).


      Retrospective correlation and comparative analysis of an interventional case series.


      A total of 418 eyes of 292 patients undergoing DSAEK surgery for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy without visual loss from comorbidities.


      Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty was performed in 548 eyes with Fuchs' dystrophy, and preoperative graft thickness (GT) was recorded. After exclusion of patients with confounding variables that would affect postoperative visual acuity, postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was measured at 6 months in 418 eyes. Pearson's correlation analysis was performed between preoperative GT and BSCVA. Cases were split into deciles on the basis of GT and BSCVA and then compared with 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square test.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 6 months postoperatively.


      Mean GT of the series was 162.9±29.0 μm (range, 80–265 μm), and mean Snellen BSCVA was 20/28 with a range of 20/16 to 20/70. There was a weak correlation between GT and BSCVA that was significant (R = 0.236, P<0.001) but only accounted for 5% of the visual outcome (R2 = 0.056). Visual outcome was best within the thinnest decile group of 45 donors (GT range, 80–124), with a mean Snellen BSCVA of 20/25 (range, 20/20–20/50), and worst within the thickest decile group of 41 donors (GT range, 200–265), with a mean Snellen BSCVA of 20/33 (range, 20/20–20/70). Post hoc comparison of BSCVA between the thickest and thinnest groups was significant (P = 0.006).


      Preoperative GT may have a small effect on visual outcome in the extremes of thickness, but not in the common range of 100 to 200 μm. Donor thickness has a tenuous relationship with visual outcome, accounting for only 5% of the variance in vision between patients, and should play a minimal role in surgical planning.

      Financial Disclosure(s)

      Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment


      Subscribe to Ophthalmology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. 2009 Eye Banking Statistical Report.
        in: Eye Bank Association of America, Washington, DC2009: 17-18 (Accessed April 3, 2012)
        • Terry M.A.
        • Shamie N.
        • Chen E.S.
        • et al.
        Endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs' dystrophy with cataract: complications and clinical results with the new triple procedure.
        Ophthalmology. 2009; 116: 631-639
        • Dirisamer M.
        • Ham L.
        • Dapena I.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcome of 200 consecutive cases after a learning curve of 25 cases.
        Arch Ophthalmol. 2011; 129: 1435-1443
        • Kruse F.E.
        • Laaser K.
        • Cursiefen C.
        • et al.
        A stepwise approach to donor preparation and insertion increases safety and outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
        Cornea. 2011; 30: 580-587
        • Price M.O.
        • Giebel A.W.
        • Fairchild K.M.
        • Price Jr, F.W.
        Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival.
        Ophthalmology. 2009; 116: 2361-2368
        • Terry M.A.
        Endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcomes in the two years following deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).
        Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 105: 530-563
        • Terry M.A.
        • Hoar K.L.
        • Wall J.
        • Ousley P.J.
        Histology of dislocations in endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK and DLEK): a laboratory-based, surgical solution to dislocation in 100 consecutive DSEK cases.
        Cornea. 2006; 25: 926-932
        • Price M.O.
        • Price Jr, F.W.
        Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue.
        Ophthalmology. 2006; 113: 1936-1942
        • Chen E.S.
        • Shamie N.
        • Terry M.A.
        • Hoar K.L.
        Endothelial keratoplasty: improvement of vision after healthy donor tissue exchange.
        Cornea. 2008; 27: 279-282
        • Chen E.S.
        • Shamie N.
        • Terry M.A.
        Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty: improvement in vision following replacement of a healthy endothelial graft.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34: 1044-1046
        • Terry M.A.
        • Ousley P.J.
        Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty: visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial survival in a large prospective series.
        Ophthalmology. 2005; 112: 1541-1548
        • Marcon A.S.
        • Terry M.A.
        • Kara-Jose N.
        • et al.
        Influence of final corneal thickness on visual acuity after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK).
        Cornea. 2007; 26: 543-545
        • Neff K.D.
        • Biber J.M.
        • Holland E.J.
        Comparison of central corneal graft thickness to visual acuity outcomes in endothelial keratoplasty.
        Cornea. 2011; 30: 388-391
        • Ahmed K.A.
        • McLaren J.W.
        • Baratz K.H.
        • et al.
        Host and graft thickness after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 2010; 150: 490-497
        • Nieuwendaal C.P.
        • van Velthoven M.E.
        • Biallosterski C.
        • et al.
        Thickness measurements of donor posterior disks after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty with anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
        Cornea. 2009; 28: 298-303
        • Shinton A.J.
        • Tsatsos M.
        • Konstantopoulos A.
        • et al.
        Impact of graft thickness on visual acuity after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2012; 96: 246-249
        • Terry M.A.
        • Shamie N.
        • Chen E.
        • et al.
        Precut tissue for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: vision, astigmatism, and endothelial survival.
        Ophthalmology. 2009; 116: 248-256
        • Terry M.A.
        • Shamie N.
        • Chen E.S.
        • et al.
        Endothelial keratoplasty: a simplified technique to minimize graft dislocation, iatrogenic graft failure, and pupillary block.
        Ophthalmology. 2008; 115: 1179-1186
        • Terry M.A.
        • Shamie N.
        • Straiko M.D.
        • et al.
        Endothelial keratoplasty: the relationship between donor tissue storage time and donor endothelial survival.
        Ophthalmology. 2011; 118: 36-40
        • Li E.Y.
        • Mohamed S.
        • Leung C.K.
        • et al.
        Agreement among 3 methods to measure corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry, Orbscan II, and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
        Ophthalmology. 2007; 114: 1842-1847
        • Tang M.
        • Ward D.
        • Ramos J.L.
        • et al.
        Measurements of microkeratome cuts in donor corneas with ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.
        Cornea. 2012; 31: 145-149
        • Chamberlain W.
        • Omid N.
        • Lin A.
        • et al.
        Comparison of corneal surface higher-order aberrations after endothelial keratoplasty, femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty, and conventional penetrating keratoplasty.
        Cornea. 2012; 31: 6-13